“Having less code should also mean lower maintenance costs, in part because customers will not have to apply patches to the parts of Windows that do not exist on their servers.” “Reducing the amount of code on a server would reduce the “attack surface area,” Cherry says, meaning hackers would have less code to aim at with their viruses.”Īaaaa, can we get that in the home edition too? Please… Now is this just XP Advance (copyright pending). I remember when, MS had their Linux hit team out, studying code so as to create a superior OS. What about the complete rewrite of the OS that Windows users were promised. … It’s one of our design goals for Longhorn.”” “We want to get to a model of role-based deployment where you might just have the bits you need for that function. There’s no reduction in the bits you get things are just roped off,” Taylor says. “”Today, it’s still the entire code base. Perhaps they can take a lesson for these programmers: Well, if MS didnt intergate everything, it wouldnt be that much of a problem now would it. But it also presents significant engineering challenges for the company, industry analysts say.” Offering a smaller code base would mark a significant technical shift for Microsoft and could help it to better address the competitive threat posed by Linux. “The new “role-based” products may appear in 2007, when the server version of Longhorn is scheduled for release.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |